Disrupsi Digital dan Kewajiban Religius
Sebuah Kerangka Teologis Kritis untuk Keadilan Ekonomi di Indonesia
Kata Kunci:
Disrupsi digital; Kewajiban religius; Teologis kritis; Keadilan ekonomi.Abstrak
Disrupsi digital telah mentransformasi ekonomi Indonesia, memperbesar ketimpangan sekaligus peluang. Sebagai institusi berpengaruh, komunitas religius sering gagap merespons secara sistemik karena kurangnya kerangka teologis yang kontekstual. Penelitian ini bertujuan membangun kerangka teologis kritis untuk memandu peran aktif komunitas religius dalam membangun ketahanan ekonomi dan keadilan sosial di era digital. Penelitian kualitatif ini menggabungkan analisis filosofis-teologis terhadap doktrin sosial Islam-Katolik dan studi kasus eksploratori pada dua inisiatif di Jawa: kewirausahaan digital pesantren dan koperasi digital paroki. Temuan menunjukkan respons teologis yang dominan masih terjebak dalam amal karitatif reaktif. Sebagai solusi, penelitian ini mengusulkan kerangka “Teologi Kewajiban Digital Ilahiah” dengan tiga pilar: (1) Hermeneutika Keadilan Prosedural Digital (reinterpretasi keadilan menyangkut akses platform, data, dan algoritma), (2) Etika Ekologi Ekonomi Digital (tanggung jawab atas kemanusiaan dalam ekosistem digital), dan (3) Pendampingan Profetik Transformatif (pergeseran peran menjadi pendamping pemberdayaan). Kerangka ini menggeser paradigma komunitas religius dari filantropi tradisional menjadi agen ketahanan sistemik. Implementasinya membutuhkan peningkatan literasi digital-teologis dan kolaborasi multidisiplin.
Referensi
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2020). Digital labour at economic margins: African workers and the global information economy. Review of African Political Economy, 47(163), 95–105.
Asutay, M., & Yilmaz, I. (2021). Constituting an Islamic social welfare function: an exploration through Islamic moral economy. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 14(3), 524–540.
Bonar, B. P. W. L. (2025). Dampak Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence pada Strategi Pemasaran UMKM di Era Digital. Indonesia Economic Journal, 1(2), 3177–3186.
Brey, P., Briggle, A., & Spence, E. (2012). The good life in a technological age. Routledge.
Campbell, H. A. (2020). Digital ecclesiology: A global conversation.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Dharma, S., & Lase, O. P. (2026). Kepemimpinan Rohani dan Akuntabilitas Moral: Sebuah Respons Teologis-Biblika terhadap Fenomena Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Teologi Pambelum, 5(2), 237–255.
Francis, F. T. P. (2020). Encyclical Letter Fratelli Tutti. Vatican City. Libreria Editrice.
Francis, P. (2015). Laudato si: On care for our common home. Our Sunday Visitor.
Gordon, F. (2019). Virginia Eubanks (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: Picador, St Martin’s Press. Law, Technology and Humans, 162–164.
Heeks, R., & Shekhar, S. (2019). Datafication, development and marginalised urban communities: An applied data justice framework. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 992–1011.
Howson, K., Graham, M., Anwar, M. A., & Woodcock, J. (2021). Digital labour and the gig economy: Emerging issues and future directions. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12183
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410.
Keskin, B. (2019). Van Dijk, Poell, and de Wall, The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World (2018). Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 3(3).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (No Title).
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.
Nadzir, M. (2015). Membangun pemberdayaan ekonomi di pesantren. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 6(1), 37–56.
Nurhattati, N., Nuraulia, R., Jasin, F. M., & Anugrahsari, S. (2021). Pemberdayaan Santri melalui E-Farming Pesantren berbasis Internet of Think: Studi Kasus di Ecopesantren Ittifaq Bandung. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 5(2), 197–208.
Nurhayati, S., & Rizkiah, R. (2023). Digital economy and inequality in Indonesia: A critical political economy perspective. Journal of Asian Economics, 85, 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2023.101592
Ones, O. P. L. (2026). Manajemen Moral dan Karakter dalam Pendidikan Kristen di Era Kontemporer. Edukris: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 2(01), 45–61.
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419–437.
Pasquale, F. (2020). Toward a fourth law of robotics. Law and Political Economy, 1(1), 1–20.
Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2018). The digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective.
Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Blank, G., Ragnedda, M., Ono, H., Hogan, B., Mesch, G. S., Cotten, S. R., Kretchmer, S. B., & Hale, T. M. (2020). Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday, 25(7).
Sakai, M. (2012). Building a partnership for social service delivery in Indonesia: state and faith‐based organisations. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 373–388.
Schwab, K., Vanham, P., & Zahidi, S. (2021). The global social mobility report. World Economic Forum.
Sen, A., & Axelsson, B. (2022). Platform capitalism and uneven development in Southeast Asia. Economy and Society, 51(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2022.2039517
Soesana, A., Sugianto, E., Sutandharu, A. N., Panjaitan, Y. K., Gani, M., Lase, O. P., Kairupan, A. Y. Y., Sihombing, R. L., Manurung, P., & Zebua, K. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Teologi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge Malden, MA.
Suharto, E. (2021a). Faith-based social services in Indonesia: A welfare mix perspective. Journal of Social Policy, 50(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000233
Suharto, E. (2021b). Religious philanthropy and social protection in Indonesia. Journal of Social Policy, 50(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000634
Suharto, E. (2021c). Transforming social philanthropy in Indonesia: From charity to empowerment. Social Policy & Administration, 55(5), 728–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12687
Tanner, K. (2019). Christianity and the new spirit of capitalism. Yale University Press.
Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In Communication and information technologies annual (Vol. 10, pp. 29–52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.
Vandaele, K., Countouris, N., & Stefano, V. (2024). Collective representation and platform work. European Labour Law Journal, 15(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231214765
Wirhaspati, S. V. (2022). Pengaruh E-Service Quality Terhadap Customer Satisfaction Pada Koperasi Kredit Kosayu Malang (Studi Pada Pengguna Aplikasi Kopdit Kosayu Mobile).
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75.
Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction. Polity.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 203–213). Routledge.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Onesiporus Pengharapan Lase, Stevanus Parinussa
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Data License Terms
